Kingswood Court, Grove Road, Luton, Beds LU1 1QJ

CAM/00KA/LCP/2022/0004 · LCP · Luton · decided 14 Apr 2023

figures not yet checked

The tribunal decided that the RTM company must pay the landlord £1,967.22 in costs for the claim notice and the dismissed proceedings, disallowing the managing agent's fees, and must also reimburse the £56 application fee.

Outcome	Other decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Not applied for
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Landlord or management company
Freeholder / landlord	Assethold Limited
Management company	Kingswood Court RTM Company Limited
Managing agent	Eagerstates Limited
Building	A block, 11 flats
Service charge years in dispute	not stated
Items in dispute	administration charges, legal and professional fees
Items disallowed or reduced	administration charges
Total demanded	£3,461.22
Total found payable	£1,967.22
Fees or costs ordered	the respondent to reimburse the applicant £56 in respect of the application fee

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n: the RTM application concerned 11 flats
freeholder: Applicant : Assethold Limited
management company: Respondent : Kingswood Court RTM Company Limited
agent: sent to the applicant c/o Eagerstates Limited dated 13 October 2022
outcome: The tribunal determines that £1,967.22 is payable in respect of the costs incurred by the applicant in consequence of the claim notice
items reduced: I do not consider that the applicant has demonstrated any reasonable costs were incurred in respect of its managing agent’s fees.
total demanded: making a total of £3,461.22
total payable: The tribunal determines that £1,967.22 is payable
costs: The tribunal also orders the respondent to reimburse the applicant £56 in respect of their application fee.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.