Ground Floor Flat A,103 Southlands Road Bromley BR2 9QT
LON/00AF/LSC/2025/1072 · service charges · Bromley · decided 20 Feb 2026
The tribunal found the outstanding service charges of £3,805.15 payable by the leaseholder after the reserve fund contributions were removed, and her claims for losses could not be decided in this forum.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Abacus Land 4 Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Craig Sheehan Block Management |
| Building | One flat, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | reserve fund |
| Total demanded | £3,805.15 |
| Total found payable | £3,805.15 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Applicant is the freeholder of 103 [name] Road which contains two flats.
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] 4 Ltd
- agent
the Applicant’s agents, SDL initially and then [name] Block Management
- outcome
are reasonable and payable for the reasons set out below
- items reduced
Ms [name] compiled new figures on the Applicant’s behalf stripping out all reserve fund contributions.
- total demanded
the Applicant now claims £3,805.15
- total payable
The Respondent is liable for the outstanding service charges in the amount of £3,805.15.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.