Flat 4 River Court , 16A River Street, Bedford MK40 1PX
CAM/00KB/LAC/2022/0003 · administration charges · Bedford · decided 2 May 2023
The tribunal decided that the £36 rent collection fee demanded as an administration charge was not payable, made orders under section 20C and paragraph 5A preventing the landlord's costs being passed on, and ordered the respondent to repay the £100 issue fee.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Eagerstates Limited |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | respondent to reimburse issue fee £100 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Assethold Limited
- agent
Representative : Eagerstates Limited
- outcome
The rent collection fee of £36 demanded on 1 December 2021 and 30
- items reduced
The rent collection fee of £36 demanded on 1 December 2021 and 30
- s20c
preventing the landlord’s costs being added to any service charge payable to them.
- costs
The respondent must also reimburse the applicant the issue fee of £100.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.