Flat 4 Bird in Hand Court 291-293 Sydenham Road London CR0 2EL
LON/00AH/LAC/2026/0006 · administration charges · Croydon · decided 11 May 2026
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal decided that no sums were owing because the administration charges demanded by the landlord were not lawfully demanded and were all disallowed.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Ltd. |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Eagerstates Ltd. |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges |
| Total demanded | £1,640 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Assethold Ltd.
- agent
Representative : Eagerstates Ltd.
- outcome
No sums are owing
- items reduced
In sum we disallow all of the administration costs.
- total demanded
Total £1640
- total payable
No sums are owing
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.