Flat 11, 269-271 High Street, London E15 2TF
LON/00BB/LSC/2022/0297 · service charges · Newham · decided 9 Jan 2024
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found most of the service charges for 2019/20 to 2021/22 payable but reduced or disallowed a number of items, including insurance, cleaning, management fees and works that should have been consulted on, and made an order under section 20C so the landlord's costs of the proceedings cannot be added to the service charge.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Eagerstates Limited |
| Building | A block, 11 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019, 2020, 2021 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
mixed-use property with 11 apartments
- freeholder
Respondent : Assethold Limited
- agent
Eagerstates Limited
- years
in respect of three years, 2019/20, 2020/21,
- outcome
we therefore reduce the sum claimed to that amount.
- items reduced
In those circumstances we disallow the sum of £720.
- s20c
makes an order under section 20C
- s20
We find this to be one set of works for which consultation should have taken place.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.