Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near KT16 9BB

Flat 10 Old Auction House, 70 Guildford Street, Chertsey, Surrey, KT16 9BB

CHI/43UG/LSC/2024/0116 · service charges · Runnymede · decided 4 Jul 2025

The tribunal found the leaseholder owed only the £1520.00 a year already paid for 2019 to 2023 and £1513.63 for 2024, with the disputed reserve fund, repair and accountant costs disallowed, no litigation costs to be charged to her, and the respondent ordered to refund her fees of £300.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Order made
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordAssethold Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentEagerstates Limited
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in dispute2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024
Items in disputelegal and professional fees, major works, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund
Items disallowed or reducedlegal and professional fees, major works, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund
Total demanded£8,914.09
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedrespondent to reimburse application and hearing fee £300

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Respondent : Assethold Limited
agent
Eagerstates Limited (“Eagerstates”)
years
for the years 2019 to 2024 for
outcome
is £1520.00. No further sums are payable as £1520.00 has been paid for
items reduced
The Respondent has not produced evidence that the costs listed in the document dated 7th December 2020 from Eagerstates were incurred or payable as service costs
total demanded
Eagerstates has claimed a debit balance of £8914.09 for service charges and other items.
s20c
None of the costs of these proceedings are relevant costs which can be
costs
The Respondent shall pay to the Applicant £300.00 as reimbursement of

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.