BS41, 20 & 22 Loom Street, Manchester M4 6AN
MAN/00BN/LDC/2025/0666 · dispensation from consultation · Manchester · decided 9 Apr 2026
The tribunal granted the landlord retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent upgrades to the automatic opening vents at the block, which were already completed, because the works were needed for safety and no leaseholders objected to them.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Abacus Land 4 Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Premier Estates |
| Building | A block, 48 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
consisting of 48 residential apartments and one commercial unit
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] 4 Limited
- agent
Premier Estates had been the managing agent for the Property since 2008
- outcome
In all the circumstances, dispensation from consultation is granted.
- s20
In all the circumstances, dispensation from consultation is granted.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.