Apartment 208 Weekday Cross Building, Pilcher Gate, The Lace Market, Nottingham NG1 1QF
BIR/00FY/LLD/2018/0002 · LLD · Nottingham · decided 1 May 2019
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the leaseholder owed £2,801.63 in historic service charges after disallowing three balancing charges and some excess amounts, and owed £366.00 in administration charges, with a section 20C order made in the landlord's favour against the leaseholder.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Holding & Management (Solitaire) Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Encore Estate Management Limited |
| Building | One flat, 98 flats · 3 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2007, 2008, 2009 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, major works, management fees, other, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | other |
| Total demanded | £4,965.18 |
| Total found payable | £2,801.63 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay £710.00 court and tribunal hearing fees and £3,000.00 (excluding VAT) solicitors' costs |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The block comprises 98 apartments on five floors.
- freeholder
The freehold interest in the property is owned by the Applicant, Holding & Management (Solitaire) Limited
- agent
The Applicant has appointed Encore Estate Management Limited to provide those services on its behalf.
- years
That figure largely represents historic charges relating to service charge years 2007/2008, 2008/2009 and 2009/2010
- outcome
The Tribunal therefore determines that the reasonable historic service charges payable by the Respondent to the Applicant are £4,965.18 (the sum claimed) less the disallowed sums
- items reduced
The Tribunal disallows the three balancing charges listed in paragraph 25 above, which total £1,118.70.
- total demanded
the Tribunal adopted the figure of £4,965.18 as the starting point.
- total payable
the Respondent is liable to pay to the Applicant the sum of £2,801.63 in respect of unpaid service charges as at 1 September 2016.
- s20c
the Tribunal makes an order under section 20C that the costs incurred by the Applicant in connection with the present proceedings are not to be regarded as relevant costs
- costs
The Court allows costs as follows – (i) £710.00 in respect of County Court fees and the Tribunal hearing fee
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.