8 Victoria Place, Victoria Road, Poole BH12 3EE
HAV/00HP/LAC/2025/0010 · administration charges · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 15 Jan 2026
The tribunal decided that the admin charges for rent collection demanded for 2022 to 2025 are not payable, as the lease does not allow them and they are not administration charges, and ordered the respondent to repay the £100 application fee.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Eagerstates Limited |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to repay the applicant's application fee of £100 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The Respondent Assethold Ltd, is the freeholder of the premises.
- agent
Their managing agents are Eagerstates Limited.
- years
demands have been issued for the years 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025
- outcome
The admin costs for the collection of rent are not payable.
- items reduced
The admin costs for the collection of rent are not payable.
- costs
The Respondents are also required to repay the Applicants their application fee of £100.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.