73 Buckingham Road, Brighton, East Sussex BN7 3RJ
CHI/00ML/LCP/2023/0002 · LCP · Brighton and Hove · decided 8 Aug 2024
The tribunal allowed part of the landlord's claimed costs of responding to a right to manage claim notice, reducing the solicitors' and managing agent's fees, and ordered the RTM company to pay half of the £100 application fee.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Eagerstates Limited |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, management fees, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | respondent to reimburse 50% of the £100 application fee to the applicant |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
This is a single property comprising five flats
- freeholder
The Applicants are the freehold owners of the property at 73 Buckingham Road, Brighton, BN1 3RJ
- agent
Eagerstates Limited (‘Eagerstates’) are their managing agents for the Property.
- outcome
The Respondents are to pay to the Applicants:
- costs
In relation to the application fee of £100 the Tribunal orders the Respondents to pay 50%.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.