Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near BN1 3RJ

73 Buckingham Road, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 3RJ

CHI/00ML/LRM/2021/0005 · right to manage · Brighton and Hove · decided 11 Jan 2022

The Tribunal allowed only part of the landlord's costs claimed from the RTM company, fixing £481.25 plus VAT for solicitor's fees, £6.85 plus VAT disbursements and £100 plus VAT for the managing agent's fee.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management company73 Buckingham Road RTM Company Limited
Managing agentEagerstates Limited
BuildingA block · 2 decisions about this building
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputeinsurance, management fees, repairs and maintenance, legal and professional fees
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£1,775.22
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The Premises contain five flats held on separate long leases.
freeholder
Applicant : Assethold Limited
management company
is 73 Buckingham Road RTM Company Limited (“the Respondent”)
agent
landlord’s managing agent, Eagerstates Limited
outcome
The Tribunal determines that the amount of costs payable by the
total demanded
The Applicant now seeks its costs of £1,775.22 incurred as landlord of the Premises

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.