Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SE25 4EJ

55 Penge Road, London, SE25 4EJ

LON/00AH/LCP/2022/0012 · LCP · Croydon · decided 27 Mar 2023

The tribunal determined that the RTM company must pay the landlord's costs of £1,949.22 for responding to the right to manage claim notice and ordered reimbursement of the £100 application fee.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordAssethold Limited
Management company55 Penge Road RTM Company
Managing agentEagerstates Ltd
BuildingOne flat, 6 flats · 5 decisions about this building
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputelegal and professional fees
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedthe respondent to reimburse the applicant's application fee of £100

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
there are six flats in the property
management company
55 Penge Road RTM Company
agent
the Applicant’s managing agents, Eagerstates Ltd
outcome
We determine under section 88(4) of the 2002 Act that costs in the sum of £1,949.22 are payable to the Applicant by the Respondent
costs
We order under rule 13(2) of the 2013 Rules that the Respondent reimburse the applicaiton fee of £100

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.