52B, Clyde Road, Croydon, Surrey, CR0 6SU
LON/00AH/LSC/2020/0292 · service charges · Croydon · decided 12 Jan 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal held that the tenant must pay his one third share of the £20,000 reserve fund contributions demanded for 2019-20 and 2020-21 as reasonable, and that the current landlord is not liable for the £4,332.48 paid to the former landlord in 2016-17, with no order for tribunal fees or under section 20C.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Abacus Land 4 Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016, 2019, 2020 |
| Items in dispute | major works, other, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
52 Clyde Road is a house converted into three flats.
- freeholder
Respondent : [name] 4 Limited
- years
service charge years 2016-17, 2019-20 and 2020-21
- outcome
In our judgment the payment of £20,000 on account is reasonable.
- s20c
The Tribunal refuses to make an order under section 20C of the
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.