52B Clyde Road, Croydon, Surrey, CR0 6SU
LON/00AH/LSC/2020/0084 · service charges · Croydon · decided 12 Jan 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal held that the current landlord is not liable to refund the £4,332.48 paid to the former landlord in 2016-17, but found the £20,000 reserve fund contributions for 2019-20 and 2020-21 reasonable and the audit fee not to be disallowed, and refused a section 20C order.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Abacus Land 4 Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016, 2019, 2020 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, major works, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
52 Clyde Road is a house converted into three flats.
- freeholder
Respondent : [name] 4 Limited
- years
service charge years 2016-17, 2019-20 and 2020-21
- outcome
since the tenant has lost on all his challenges, we should make no order for costs
- s20c
The Tribunal refuses to make an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.