43 Erebus Drive, London SE28 0GB
LON/00AL/LSC/2019/0424 · service charges · Greenwich · decided 14 Dec 2022
The Tribunal found the full service and administration charges of £4,932.04 for 2017-18 and 2018-19 reasonable and payable, and refused a section 20C order; ground rent, interest and costs were left to the county court.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Holding & Management (Solitaire) Ltd |
| Management company | Holding & Management (Solitaire) Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, other, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £4,932.04 |
| Total found payable | £4,932.04 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Holding & Management (Solitaire) Ltd
- management company
The Applicant is the freehold owner of and management company for a development
- years
for the years 2017-18 and 2018-19
- outcome
are reasonable and payable.
- total demanded
in the sum of £4,932.04
- total payable
in the sum of £4,932.04, are reasonable and payable.
- s20c
The Tribunal has refused to make an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.