Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SE13 5AX

41a-41d Belmont Hill, London, SE13 5AX

LON/00AZ/LOA/2020/0002 · LOA · Lewisham · decided 21 Apr 2021

The Tribunal found the RTM claim notice was validly given and the applicant RTM company was entitled to acquire the right to manage 41a-41d Belmont Hill, and ordered the freeholder to refund the £300 tribunal fee.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedRTM company
Freeholder / landlordAssethold Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentEagerstates Limited
BuildingA block
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputenot stated
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedthe respondent to reimburse the applicant's tribunal fee of £300

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Respondent : Assethold Limited
agent
managing agents for the landlord
outcome
The Tribunal determines that on 4 November 2020, the Applicant was entitled to acquire the right to manage the premises pursuant to section 84(5)(a) of the Act
costs
the Respondent shall pay the Applicant £300 within 28 days of this Decision, in respect of the reimbursement of the tribunal fees paid by the Applicant

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.