40 South Road, Luton LU1 3UD (also known as Ceira Court)
CAM/00KA/LRM/2024/0602 · right to manage · Luton · decided 8 Jul 2025
The tribunal found that neither counter notice was valid because Assethold Limited and its agent were not entitled to serve them, so the right to manage is taken to have been acquired from 22 September 2024, and the second respondent was ordered to pay the £110 tribunal fee.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Eagerstates Limited |
| Building | A block, 12 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | second respondent to reimburse the applicant's tribunal fee £110 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The property is a purpose-built block of 12 self-contained apartments
- agent
their managing agents Eagerstates Limited
- outcome
The tribunal determines that Assethold Limited were not entitled to serve a counter notice
- costs
The tribunal orders the second respondent to pay the applicant £110 in respect of their tribunal fees.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.