26 - 26A Mount Nod Road London SW16 2LH
LON/00AY/LRM/2022/0024 · right to manage · Lambeth · decided 16 Jan 2023
The tribunal declared that the RTM company was entitled to acquire the right to manage the building, and ordered the second respondent to pay the applicant £900 in costs and reimburse the £100 application fee.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Haywoods Capital Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Eagerstates Ltd |
| Building | A block, 7 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay the applicant £900 costs under Rule 13 and reimburse application fee £100 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The property comprises 7 self-contained flats
- freeholder
Respondent 1 : Haywoods Capital Ltd
- agent
Representative : Eagerstates Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal declares that on the
- costs
£900 to the Applicant which the Tribunal orders the second
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 16 Jan 2023.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.