245 Stanstead Road, London SE23 1HY
LON/00AZ/LRM/2019/0006 · right to manage · Lewisham · decided 9 Aug 2019
The tribunal found the RTM claim invalid because the claim notice was not given to the freeholder, Badli Limited, as section 79(6) requires, and it declined the applicant's request for costs against the respondent.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Eagerstates Limited |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant's costs application under rule 13 was declined |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
On the relevant date the landlord was Badli Limited, which company was the registered proprietor of the freehold title at HM Land Registry.
- agent
Eagerstates Limited, the managing agents for Assethold
- outcome
The tribunal determines the claim notice was not given to each person as required by section 79(6) of the 2002 Act and, therefore, the applicant was not entitled to acquire the right to manage the premises specified in the claim notice on the relevant date.
- costs
The tribunal declines to award costs against the respondent or its legal representative under rule 13 of the 2013 Rules and section 29 of the 2007 Act.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.