237A Brixton Hill, London, SW2 1EQ
LON/00AY/LSC/2025/0760 · service charges · Lambeth · decided 14 Oct 2025
The tribunal decided that Assethold Limited, which held only an equitable interest and not legal title to the freehold, cannot demand service charges for 2022 to 2024, the respondent must refund the tribunal fees, and no landlord costs of the proceedings may be passed through the service charge.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Eagerstates Limited |
| Building | A block, 14 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022, 2023, 2024 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay the applicant £114.00 tribunal fees |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a block of 14 flats over ground floor commercial premises constructed in 2021
- freeholder
The registered proprietor of the property is Chadd Properties Ltd.
- agent
Respondent : Eagerstates Limited
- years
the service charge years 2022, 2023, 2024
- outcome
The tribunal finds that Assethold Limited as the equitable owner is not entitled to demand service charges for the years 2022, 2023, and 2024.
- s20c
The tribunal makes an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 so that none of the landlord’s costs of the tribunal proceedings may be passed to the lessees through any service charge.
- costs
the Respondent shall pay the Applicant £110.00 £114.001 within 28 days of this Decision, in respect of the reimbursement of the tribunal fees paid by the Applicant
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.