20 Beeleigh Link, Chelmsford, Essex, CM2 6RG
CAM/22UF/LIS/2019/0025 · LIS · Chelmsford · decided 4 Feb 2020
The tribunal found that the charges for replacing the windows and doors at the block, including glass and frames, were reasonably incurred and payable by the leaseholders, and refused the section 20C application.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Holding & Management (Solitaire) Ltd. |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £3,982.69 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to bear its own application fees |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a purpose-built block of four flats
- freeholder
Respondent : Holding & Management (Solitaire) Ltd.
- outcome
the service charges demanded in respect of the window and door replacement (their frames and glass) at the block in which the property is situated, were reasonably incurred and payable by the Applicants.
- total demanded
the predicted costs of £3,982.69 which the Respondent would seek from the Applicants
- s20c
the application made under section 20C of the 1985 Act is refused.
- costs
they naturally fall to the Applicants to meet them, having been unsuccessful on this application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.