167 High Street, London Colney, St Albans, AL2 1RP

CAM/26UG/LSC/2025/0691 · service charges · St Albans · decided 16 Mar 2026

figures not yet checked

The Tribunal decided the £150 administration charge for late rent was not payable, and the Respondent's costs of these proceedings cannot be charged to the Applicant, but refused to order reimbursement of the tribunal fees.

Outcome	Not payable
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	Assethold Ltd
Management company	none named
Managing agent	Eagerstates Ltd
Building	A block
Service charge years in dispute	not stated
Items in dispute	administration charges
Items disallowed or reduced	administration charges
Total demanded	£150
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder: Respondent : Assethold Ltd
agent: It has appointed Eagerstates Ltd to manage the Property and the wider development
outcome: charging the Applicant £150 was plainly disproportionate and unreasonable
items reduced: charging the Applicant £150 was plainly disproportionate and unreasonable
total demanded: charged the Applicant an administration charge of £150
s20c: the applications made under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.