1,5,6,7,8,9 & 10 Old School Place, Union Street, Maidstone Kent ME14 1EQ Old School Place, Union Street, Maidstone Kent ME14 1EQ
CHI/29UH/LSC/2020/0104 · service charges · Maidstone · decided 22 Mar 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal set the service charges for 2015-2019 at reduced amounts, dispensed with s.20 consultation for completed major works, approved the 2020-21 budget, made an unlimited s.20C order and ordered the landlord to repay £400 in fees.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Adriatic Land 1 (GR3) Ltd |
| Management company | Residential Management Group Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 10 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2015 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the Respondent has divided the service charge equally between the ten flats in this block
- freeholder
Respondent : [name] 1 (GR3) Ltd
- management company
Residential Management Group Ltd
- years
the service charge year 2015-6 is £9,032.33
- outcome
the Tribunal makes an unlimited order under s20C
- items reduced
The Tribunal agrees and this invoice is reduced to £50.
- s20c
The Tribunal makes an unlimited order under s20C Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in favour of Pak Cheong Tang (Flat 1)
- s20
The Tribunal determines that it will exercise its discretion to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.