128 Christchurch Road, London, SW2 3DF
LON/00AY/LDC/2024/0058 · dispensation from consultation · Lambeth · decided 15 May 2024
The tribunal granted the landlord retrospective dispensation, without conditions, from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent gutter repairs costing £2,007.20 carried out in December 2023, but did not decide whether the charges are payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Orchidbase Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 7 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £2,007.20 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The property is a late Victorin property which has been converted to create seven flats.
- freeholder
Applicant : Orchidbase Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants this application to dispense retrospectively with the consultation requirements imposed by section 20
- total demanded
at a cost of £2,007.20
- s20
The Tribunal grants this application to dispense retrospectively with the consultation requirements imposed by section 20
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.