Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near DY4 0AY

12 Oak Close, Gospel Oak, Tipton, DY4 0AY

BIR/00CS/LSC/2018/0013 · service charges · Sandwell · decided 22 Jul 2021

The tribunal awarded £85 in contractual interest on unpaid charges, dismissed the claim for administration charges, and made no order for statutory interest or costs.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not clear
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentBlue Property Management UK Limited
BuildingAn estate · 2 decisions about this building
Service charge years in dispute2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017
Items in disputeadministration charges, other
Items disallowed or reducedadministration charges, other
Total demanded£3,918.33
Total found payable£85
Fees or costs orderedno order for costs

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

agent
Representative: [name], Blue Property Management UK
years
interest upon unpaid service charges and administration charges for the period 2012 to 2017.
outcome
the Court finds that the appropriate sum by way of contractual interest is £85.00.
items reduced
Accordingly, the claim for administration charges is dismissed.
total demanded
interest in the sum of £3918.33.
total payable
Judgment for the Applicant in the sum of £85.oo
costs
the appropriate Order for costs is no Order.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.