27 Norton Grove, Maghull, Liverpool, L31 5JX
MAN/00CA/MNR/2026/0308 · Sefton · decided 22 Jul 2026
old rules| Rent before the notice | £880 |
|---|---|
| Rent the landlord proposed | £1,200 |
| Rent the tribunal decided | £930 +5.7% on the rent before |
| New rent takes effect | 20 Jun 2026 |
| Date of the landlord's notice | 17 Apr 2026 |
| Rules | Old rules (notice dated before 1 May 2026): the tribunal could also set a rent higher than the landlord's figure. |
| Property | house, 3 bedrooms |
Rents per calendar month as the tribunal recorded them (weekly rents × 52 ÷ 12). Read from the PDF automatically.
From the tribunal's valuation
Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area and the comparables provided by the parties, the Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property in good order would be in the order of £1,150.00 pcm. This is the rent we would expect the property to let for in the open market if it was in the same general condition as comparable properties. … Taking into account the parties’ submissions as well as the Tribunal’s previous determination, the Tribunal considered that most of the more value-significant improvements to the Property were carried out before 30 July 2014 and consequently are not to be taken into account. The improvements understood to have been made by the Tenant after her father’s death, which the Tribunal does take into account in this determination are limited to the following points: a further improvement to the kitchen, remedying cracks in the front rendering to the Property and replastering internally, a new shed in the garden and new fence panels, a new chimney flue, and new curtains and blinds. … The Tribunal has made adjustments in relation to the following: a) Tenant improvements as enumerated in paragraph 16 and Tenant provision of white goods. The full valuation is shown below: Starting Rent £1,150.00 pcm Less a) Items given under a) above £220.00 Market rent £930.00 pcm
An extract. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.
The original
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.