75 Bradstowe House, Headstone Road, Harrow, HA1 1EH
LON/00AQ/MRA/2026/0015 · Harrow · decided 1 Jul 2026
bills included| Rent before the notice | £2,200 |
|---|---|
| Rent the landlord proposed | £2,305 |
| Rent the tribunal decided | £2,305 +4.8% on the rent before |
| New rent takes effect | 1 Sep 2026 |
| Date of the landlord's notice | 5 Jun 2026 |
| Rules | New rules (notice dated on or after 1 May 2026): the tribunal could only confirm or lower the landlord's figure. |
| Property | flat, 2 bedrooms |
Rents per calendar month as the tribunal recorded them (weekly rents × 52 ÷ 12). Read from the PDF automatically.
From the tribunal's valuation
The Tribunal considers that the most useful comparables are apartments of the same size in the same building. The directly comparable two-bedroom apartments were marketed at £2,250 pcm and £2,350 pcm, with one-bedroom flats in the same development marketed at £1,750 pcm. The Tribunal has also taken into account the additional charges now made for parking and Wi-Fi. The Tenants currently pay £40 pcm for parking, whereas parking is now charged at £100 pcm, producing a saving of £60 pcm. The Tenants also benefit from broadband included in the rent, whereas Wi-Fi is now charged separately at £50 pcm. Those two items amount to a combined benefit of £110 pcm. The Property is also partly furnished, as set out in paragraph 5. … Its statutory task is to determine the rent at which the Property might reasonably be expected to let in the open market at the relevant date, on the same tenancy terms other than as to rent. … Relying on its own expertise and general knowledge of rental values in the area, and having regard to the comparable evidence while allowing for differences in size, layout, parking, condition, facilities and included services, the Tribunal determines that the open-market rent for the Property is £2,305 pcm. …
An extract. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.
The original
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.