11 Gilda Avenue, London EN3 7UJ
LON/00AK/MNR/2026/0064 · Enfield · decided 20 Jul 2026
rules unclear| Rent before the notice | £1,600 |
|---|---|
| Rent the landlord proposed | £1,900 |
| Rent the tribunal decided | £1,900 +18.8% on the rent before |
| New rent takes effect | 6 Jan 2026 |
| Date of the landlord's notice | not stated |
| Rules | Not clear from the decision. |
| Property | house, 3 bedrooms |
Rents per calendar month as the tribunal recorded them (weekly rents × 52 ÷ 12). Read from the PDF automatically.
From the tribunal's valuation
Neither party made submissions on the jurisdictional issues that were raised by the Tribunal at the commencement of this case. Although the Landlord has not used the new Form 4B as the correct notice to increase the rent, we find that the old Form 4 is essentially the same and we do not consider that this would invalidate the Notice of Increase. Likewise, we find that the Notice of Increase and the covering letter are not dated. However, as the Tenants do not take this point, we do not consider that it would be appropriate for this Tribunal to find that it does not have jurisdiction on this issue. As was previously explained any issue regarding the validity of a Notice of Increase is a matter for the County Court and the Tribunal only takes a view to ascertain whether it can proceed to determine the rent. We find that in this case we do have jurisdiction and we make a determination of the rent. … The range of comparables provided by the Landlord are a useful guide to asking rents of three-bedroom houses in the vicinity. The range of values, with the exclusion of the asking rent of £3,250, echo the Tribunal’s views and our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area. The Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property modernised and in good order would be in the order of £2,200 pcm. …
An extract. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.
The original
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.