208a High Street, Bromley, Kent BR1 1PW
LON/00AF/MNR/2026/0207 · Bromley · decided 1 Jun 2026
old rulesThe tribunal did not set a rent in this decision (for example, the application was withdrawn or struck out, or this is a later ruling on an earlier decision). See the original for details.
| Rent before the notice | £1,200 |
|---|---|
| Rent the landlord proposed | £1,850 |
| Date of the landlord's notice | 30 Mar 2026 |
| Rules | Old rules (notice dated before 1 May 2026): the tribunal could also set a rent higher than the landlord's figure. |
| Property | not stated |
Rents per calendar month as the tribunal recorded them (weekly rents × 52 ÷ 12). Read from the PDF automatically.
From the tribunal's valuation
This is because the tenancy agreement contains a rent review clause from which the parties could determine the rent. … The landlord may elect to increase the rent to bring it in line with the current market rent of similar properties in the area’.. … In reaching its determination the Tribunal relies on the following legislation and case law: 7. Increases of rent under assured periodic tenancies - (1) This section applies to— (a) a statutory periodic tenancy other than one which, by virtue of paragraph 11 or paragraph 12 in Part I of Schedule 1 to this Act, cannot for the time being be an assured tenancy; and (b) any other periodic tenancy which is an assured tenancy, other than one in relation to which there is a provision, for the time being binding on the tenant, under which the rent for a particular period of the tenancy will or may be greater than the rent for an earlier period. … Changes in net rent (a) The net rent payable under this agreement will be reviewed in April every year, regardless of when the tenancy started. (b) We may increase or decrease the rent by giving you four weeks’ notice in writing. The notice will set out the proposed net rent and service charge.” 9.
An extract. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.
The original
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.