Flat 1, Beverley, Lower Town, Malborough, Kingsbridge, Devon, TQ7 3SE
CHI/18UG/MNR/2023/0137 · South Hams · decided 15 Jul 2023
old rules| Rent before the notice | £550 |
|---|---|
| Rent the landlord proposed | £650 |
| Rent the tribunal decided | £650 +18.2% on the rent before |
| New rent takes effect | 4 May 2023 |
| Date of the landlord's notice | 20 Feb 2023 |
| Rules | Old rules (notice dated before 1 May 2026): the tribunal could also set a rent higher than the landlord's figure. |
| Property | flat, 2 bedrooms |
Rents per calendar month as the tribunal recorded them (weekly rents × 52 ÷ 12). Read from the PDF automatically.
From the tribunal's valuation
The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so. … The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant are not relevant to this issue. … Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in the Kingsbridge area the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £725 per month. … However, the property is not let in such a condition as would command this full rent and the Tribunal needs to make some adjustment to this full rent to allow for the condition of the property. … The Tribunal has considered very carefully each parties submissions and, using its own expertise, considers that a deduction of £75 should be applied for a lack of white goods (except for the cooker), dated kitchen units and basic electric heating system. This reduces the rental figure to £650 per month. …
An extract. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.
The original
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.