24 Chelsworth Avenue, Great Cornard, Sudbury, CO10 0LS
CAM/42UB/MNR/2025/0746 · Babergh · decided 24 Jan 2026
old rules| Rent before the notice | £850 |
|---|---|
| Rent the landlord proposed | £1,175 |
| Rent the tribunal decided | £1,000 +17.6% on the rent before |
| New rent takes effect | 3 Nov 2025 |
| Date of the landlord's notice | 12 Sep 2025 |
| Rules | Old rules (notice dated before 1 May 2026): the tribunal could also set a rent higher than the landlord's figure. |
| Property | house, 3 bedrooms |
Rents per calendar month as the tribunal recorded them (weekly rents × 52 ÷ 12). Read from the PDF automatically.
From the tribunal's valuation
The Tribunal has considered all the evidence provided to it but does not consider it proportionate to set out its conclusions on every point raised. The lack of comment in respect of any particular issue should not therefore be construed as meaning that the Tribunal has not had regard to such evidence. … In determining the market rent, the Tribunal has regard to prevailing levels of rent in the general locality and achieved rental values in respect of other properties of comparable accommodation and provision that would be likely to be considered by a prospective tenant. … The current rent, and the period that has passed since that rent was agreed or determined is not relevant. Previous changes in rent are therefore disregarded as the Tribunal is required to assess the rent that would be offered by a prospective tenant who has no knowledge of the existing or previous rents. Similarly, historic rents achieved elsewhere are of limited relevance. … The legislation requires the Tribunal to have regard to market demand assuming that the landlord is willing. The Tribunal is therefore unable to have any regard to the personal circumstances or identities of the actual landlord and tenant in assessing the level of rent. …
An extract. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.
The original
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.