83C Pinnocks Way Botley Oxford OX2 9DE
CAM/38UE/MNR/2026/0034 · Vale of White Horse · decided 1 Jun 2026
old rulesfigures not yet checked| Rent before the notice | £1,000 |
|---|---|
| Rent the landlord proposed | £1,150 |
| Rent the tribunal decided | £1,025 +2.5% on the rent before |
| New rent takes effect | 25 Feb 2026 |
| Date of the landlord's notice | 21 May 2024 |
| Rules | Old rules (notice dated before 1 May 2026): the tribunal could also set a rent higher than the landlord's figure. |
| Property | flat, 1 bedroom |
Rents per calendar month as the tribunal recorded them (weekly rents × 52 ÷ 12). Read from the PDF automatically; these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics, so compare them with the original.
From the tribunal's valuation
32 The Tribunal is content that the Notice was correctly addressed received and acted on and does not sustain the tenant’s argument that it was invalid. Absence of reference to the correct last review date and to the village/suburb do not invalid the current notice. The tenancy is clearly an assured periodic tenancy now, the former fixed terms having expired and the copy provided is sufficient, if brief in format. The review date was not within the last 12 months of the current date. However at present, the place of the definitive determination of validity rests with the County Court to whom either party may refer the question. … 34 From these and from the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels in and around Oxford, it determines that the subject Property would let on normal Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST) terms, for £1100 pcm, fully fitted and in good order. This is the rent we would expect the Property to let for in the open market if it was in the same condition as comparable properties including landlord’s white goods carpets and curtains. 35 The tenant referred to the condition inside the Property, noting a small number of defects some in the past, others current. These included: 2No. of 4No. …
An extract. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.
The original
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.