56 Albert Road, Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, RG9 1SD
CAM/00MC/MNR/2022/0034 · South Oxfordshire · decided 25 Aug 2022
old rulesThe tribunal did not set a rent in this decision (for example, the application was withdrawn or struck out, or this is a later ruling on an earlier decision). See the original for details.
| Rent before the notice | £1,350 |
|---|---|
| Rent the landlord proposed | not stated |
| Date of the landlord's notice | not stated |
| Rules | Old rules (notice dated before 1 May 2026): the tribunal could also set a rent higher than the landlord's figure. |
| Property | not stated |
Rents per calendar month as the tribunal recorded them (weekly rents × 52 ÷ 12). Read from the PDF automatically.
From the tribunal's valuation
Neither Party has submitted legal arguments as to the status of the Tenancy, but it appears to the Tribunal that the Tenant’s argument depends upon an assumption that the service of the Section 21 Notice terminated the Tenancy such that the terms contained therein no longer apply. … The Landlord is therefore unable to terminate the Tenancy until the Property has been vacated either by agreement, or on the obtaining of a Court Order following the service of a notice and submission of an application in accordance with Section 21 of the 1988 Act. … The service of notice on the Tenant pursuant to Section 21 of the 1988 Act merely commences the process of obtaining a Court Order and does not terminate the Tenancy. … The Tenant could not therefore be forced to vacate the Property unless the Court responds favourably to the Section 21 application and grants a Court Order or voluntary agreement to vacate is reached. The Tribunal understands, in this context, that no Court Order was issued, and the Tenant vacated voluntarily. … The Tenancy did not, therefore, come to an end until the date that the Tenant vacated. The Tenant therefore remained subject to the terms of that Tenancy after the service of the Section 21 notice. … It therefore follows that Section 14 of the Act does not apply and the Tribunal has no jurisdiction in this matter. …
An extract. To keep people's names out, any sentence that might contain one is left out (marked …). The full reasons are in the original decision.
The original
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.