Leasehold decisions matching "Warren House and Atwood House, Beckford Close, London W14 8TR"
Based on 2 decisions whose published address matches "Warren House and Atwood House, Beckford Close, London W14 8TR".
What the tribunal decided here
2 decisions: service charges 1, dispensation from consultation 1. 1 is a service charge case, 0 with a readable outcome.
Dispensation applications (landlord-driven, never in the share above): 1, granted 1, refused 0.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.
How these figures are counted
"Readable outcome" means the decision states one of: payable as demanded, reduced, substantially reduced (more than a third off, as the decision's own figures show), not payable, or dismissed. Withdrawn and procedural decisions, dispensation, manager, right-to-manage and breach-of-lease cases are listed but not counted in that share. A section 20C order is counted only where the decision says it was made or refused; "not clear" means it was asked for but not decided in the document. Figures are as the decisions state them; nothing is added up. Decisions marked "figures not yet checked" (1 here: the regex and model readings disagreed on the outcome, the section 20C result or a total) are listed but left out of the counts.
| Building | Case | Outcome | Managing agent | Freeholder / landlord | Management company | Items in dispute | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warren House and Atwood House, Beckford Close, London W14 8TR figures not yet checked | service charges | Payable as demanded s.20C refused |
Premier Estates Limited | FIT Nominee Limited | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, other, reserve fund | 24 Aug 2022 | |
| Warren House and Atwood House, Beckford Close, London W14 8TR | dispensation from consultation | Dispensation granted | Premier Estates Limited | FIT Nominee Limited | major works | 24 Aug 2022 |
Individual freeholders and leaseholders are never named here; companies are, as the decision names them.
Challenging a service charge? The rules and the nearest decisions.