Leasehold decisions near IP12 1FL
Based on 2 decisions within 10 km of IP12 1FL.
The search widens from 2 km (to 5, then 10 km) until at least 10 decisions are found.
What the tribunal decided here
2 decisions: service charges 1, dispensation from consultation 1. 1 is a service charge case, 1 with a readable outcome.
Only 1 decision with a readable outcome. That is too few to show a pattern.
Dispensation applications (landlord-driven, never in the share above): 1, granted 1, refused 0.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.
How these figures are counted
"Readable outcome" means the decision states one of: payable as demanded, reduced, substantially reduced (more than a third off, as the decision's own figures show), not payable, or dismissed. Withdrawn and procedural decisions, dispensation, manager, right-to-manage and breach-of-lease cases are listed but not counted in that share. A section 20C order is counted only where the decision says it was made or refused; "not clear" means it was asked for but not decided in the document. Figures are as the decisions state them; nothing is added up. Decisions marked "figures not yet checked" (0 here: the regex and model readings disagreed on the outcome, the section 20C result or a total) are listed but left out of the counts.
| Building | Case | Outcome | Managing agent | Freeholder / landlord | Management company | Items in dispute | Decided | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 The Malt Yard, Old Maltings Approach, Melton, Woodbridge, Suffolk, IP12 1FL | service charges | Reduced s.20C refused |
Rendall and Rittner Limited | Lifestory Group Limited | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, major works, management fees, repairs and maintenance, utilities | 8 Jul 2020 | 0.0 km | |
| Whitehall Place, Thoroughfare, Woodbridge, IP12 1FB | dispensation from consultation | Dispensation granted | Whitehall Investment Ltd | repairs and maintenance | 5 Nov 2019 | 0.6 km |
Individual freeholders and leaseholders are never named here; companies are, as the decision names them.
Challenging a service charge? The rules and the nearest decisions.