Leasehold decisions matching "Dickens Heath Estate, Shirley, Solihull, B90"
Based on 2 decisions whose published address matches "Dickens Heath Estate, Shirley, Solihull, B90".
What the tribunal decided here
2 decisions: service charges 1, LIS 1. 2 are service charge cases, 0 with a readable outcome.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.
How these figures are counted
"Readable outcome" means the decision states one of: payable as demanded, reduced, substantially reduced (more than a third off, as the decision's own figures show), not payable, or dismissed. Withdrawn and procedural decisions, dispensation, manager, right-to-manage and breach-of-lease cases are listed but not counted in that share. A section 20C order is counted only where the decision says it was made or refused; "not clear" means it was asked for but not decided in the document. Figures are as the decisions state them; nothing is added up. Decisions marked "figures not yet checked" (2 here: the regex and model readings disagreed on the outcome, the section 20C result or a total) are listed but left out of the counts.
| Building | Case | Outcome | Managing agent | Freeholder / landlord | Management company | Items in dispute | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dickens Heath Estate, Shirley, Solihull, B90 figures not yet checked | service charges | Other decision s.20C refused |
Centrick Property Limited | Dickens Heath Management Company Limited | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities | 19 May 2022 | |
| Dickens Heath Estate, Shirley, Solihull, B90 figures not yet checked | LIS | Other decision s.20C refused |
Centrick Property Limited | Dickens Heath Management Company Limited | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities | 19 May 2022 |
Individual freeholders and leaseholders are never named here; companies are, as the decision names them.
Challenging a service charge? The rules and the nearest decisions.