Leasehold decisions matching "Bracken House, 44-58 Charles Street, Manchester, M1 7BD"
Based on 2 decisions whose published address matches "Bracken House, 44-58 Charles Street, Manchester, M1 7BD".
What the tribunal decided here
2 decisions: service charges 1, dispensation from consultation 1. 1 is a service charge case, 1 with a readable outcome.
Only 1 decision with a readable outcome. That is too few to show a pattern.
Dispensation applications (landlord-driven, never in the share above): 1, granted 1, refused 0.
Items most often disallowed or reduced here: legal and professional fees (1).
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.
How these figures are counted
"Readable outcome" means the decision states one of: payable as demanded, reduced, substantially reduced (more than a third off, as the decision's own figures show), not payable, or dismissed. Withdrawn and procedural decisions, dispensation, manager, right-to-manage and breach-of-lease cases are listed but not counted in that share. A section 20C order is counted only where the decision says it was made or refused; "not clear" means it was asked for but not decided in the document. Figures are as the decisions state them; nothing is added up. Decisions marked "figures not yet checked" (0 here: the regex and model readings disagreed on the outcome, the section 20C result or a total) are listed but left out of the counts.
| Building | Case | Outcome | Managing agent | Freeholder / landlord | Management company | Items in dispute | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flat 22, Bracken House, 44-58 Charles Street, Manchester, M1 7BD | service charges | Reduced s.20C refused |
Grey GR Limited Partnership | insurance, legal and professional fees, other, repairs and maintenance | 3 May 2021 | ||
| Bracken House, 44-58 Charles Street, Manchester, M1 7BD | dispensation from consultation | Dispensation granted | Inspired Property Management | Grey GR Limited Partnership | major works | 14 Mar 2021 |
Individual freeholders and leaseholders are never named here; companies are, as the decision names them.
Challenging a service charge? The rules and the nearest decisions.