Leasehold decisions matching "16 Arterberry Road, London, SW20 8AJ"
Based on 3 decisions whose published address matches "16 Arterberry Road, London, SW20 8AJ".
What the tribunal decided here
3 decisions: variation of a management order 2, service charges 1. 1 is a service charge case, 0 with a readable outcome.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.
How these figures are counted
"Readable outcome" means the decision states one of: payable as demanded, reduced, substantially reduced (more than a third off, as the decision's own figures show), not payable, or dismissed. Withdrawn and procedural decisions, dispensation, manager, right-to-manage and breach-of-lease cases are listed but not counted in that share. A section 20C order is counted only where the decision says it was made or refused; "not clear" means it was asked for but not decided in the document. Figures are as the decisions state them; nothing is added up. Decisions marked "figures not yet checked" (1 here: the regex and model readings disagreed on the outcome, the section 20C result or a total) are listed but left out of the counts.
| Building | Case | Outcome | Managing agent | Freeholder / landlord | Management company | Items in dispute | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flat 1-5, 16 Arterberry Road, London, SW20 8AJ | variation of a management order | Other decision | insurance, major works, repairs and maintenance, cleaning and grounds | 12 Dec 2022 | |||
| 16 Arterberry Road, London, SW20 8AJ | variation of a management order | Other decision | Urang Property Management Limited | management fees, major works, reserve fund | 28 Oct 2020 | ||
| Flat 4, 16 Arterberry Road, London, SW20 8AJ figures not yet checked | service charges | Reduced | Urang Property Management Limited | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities | 9 Apr 2020 |
Individual freeholders and leaseholders are never named here; companies are, as the decision names them.
Challenging a service charge? The rules and the nearest decisions.