Leasehold decisions matching "1 Palace Gate, Kensington, London, W8 5LS"
Based on 3 decisions whose published address matches "1 Palace Gate, Kensington, London, W8 5LS".
What the tribunal decided here
3 decisions: appointment of a manager 2, variation of a management order 1. 0 are service charge cases, 0 with a readable outcome.
Items most often disallowed or reduced here: reserve fund (1), cleaning and grounds (1).
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.
How these figures are counted
"Readable outcome" means the decision states one of: payable as demanded, reduced, substantially reduced (more than a third off, as the decision's own figures show), not payable, or dismissed. Withdrawn and procedural decisions, dispensation, manager, right-to-manage and breach-of-lease cases are listed but not counted in that share. A section 20C order is counted only where the decision says it was made or refused; "not clear" means it was asked for but not decided in the document. Figures are as the decisions state them; nothing is added up. Decisions marked "figures not yet checked" (0 here: the regex and model readings disagreed on the outcome, the section 20C result or a total) are listed but left out of the counts.
| Building | Case | Outcome | Managing agent | Freeholder / landlord | Management company | Items in dispute | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Palace Gate, Kensington, London, W8 5LS | appointment of a manager | Other decision | Winchester Park Ltd | 27 Aug 2020 | |||
| 1 Palace Gate, Kensington, London, W8 5LS | variation of a management order | Other decision | Winchester Park Limited | insurance, management fees, major works, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, legal and professional fees | 23 Jul 2020 | ||
| 1 Palace Gate, Kensington, London, W8 5LS | appointment of a manager | Other decision | Winchester Park Ltd | Winchester Park Limited | insurance, major works, repairs and maintenance, cleaning and grounds, reserve fund | 12 Feb 2020 |
Individual freeholders and leaseholders are never named here; companies are, as the decision names them.
Challenging a service charge? The rules and the nearest decisions.