Zest Apartments, 1-18, 432 Church Street, Edmonton, London N9 9FB
LON/00AK/LDC/2024/0644 · dispensation from consultation · Enfield · decided 10 Jul 2025
The tribunal granted the applicant dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent fire-safety works to the balcony timber decking, finding the leaseholders had shown no relevant prejudice.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | MCS (Management Company Services) |
| Building | A block, 18 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprises 18 self-contained flats forming part of a block
- agent
MCS (Management Company Services)
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for the dispensation of all or any
- s20
the leaseholders of the properties have not suffered any prejudice by the failure to consult
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.