Woburn Court, Bedford Road, London, E18 2RS
LON/00BC/LSC/2023/0045 · service charges · Redbridge · decided 22 Dec 2023
The tribunal found the car park resurfacing, electric gates and lease variation costs payable and reasonable, the reserve fund collection was wrongly demanded but had been spent on payable items, and no s.20C order or Rule 13 costs were made.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Woburn Court Management (Redbridge) Limited |
| Building | A block, 24 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees, major works, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The subject property comprises a purpose built block of 24 flats built-in
- freeholder
Woburn Court Freehold Limited
- agent
Woburn Court Management (Redbridge) Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal concludes that the service charge for upgrading the carpark is payable and reasonable.
- s20c
The Tribunal do not make a s.20C Order to restrict the charges payable by the Applicant arising from this application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.