Windsor House, 33 Upton Park, Slough, Berkshire SL1 2DA
CAM/00MD/LDC/2021/0024 · dispensation from consultation · Slough · decided 18 Aug 2021
The tribunal granted the landlord Mintoncrest Ltd retrospective dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent roof, drainage and sewage pump repairs at Windsor House, as no leaseholder objected.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Mintoncrest Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is a purpose-built block of 8 flats including a basement flat.
- freeholder
Applicant : Mintoncrest Ltd
- outcome
The tribunal determines under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 to dispense with all the consultation requirements in respect of qualifying works
- s20
The tribunal determines under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 to dispense with all the consultation requirements in respect of qualifying works
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.