Winckley House, 16 Cross Street, Preston, PR1 3AJ
MAN/30UK/LDC/2023/0053 · dispensation from consultation · Preston · decided 28 Mar 2024
The tribunal granted the landlord's management company dispensation from the s.20 consultation requirements for a partial lift refurbishment at Winckley House because the lifts were urgently needed, while noting leaseholders can still challenge the costs later.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Homestead Consultancy Services Ltd. |
| Building | A block, 76 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The building was converted in 2020 and contains 76 apartments.
- agent
Representative : [name] Consultancy Services Ltd.
- outcome
Compliance with the consultation requirements of s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is dispensed with in relation to the works set out in a quotation dated 6 March 2023
- s20
Compliance with the consultation requirements of s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is dispensed with in relation to the works set out in a quotation dated 6 March 2023
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.