Wilmington Close, Watford, Hertfordshire WD18 0FQ
CAM/26UK/LAM/2023/0005 · appointment of a manager · Watford · decided 3 Mar 2025
figures not yet checkedThe Tribunal refused to appoint a manager for Wilmington Close because no ground under section 24(2) of the 1987 Act was proven and it was not just and convenient, so the application was dismissed and no section 20C order was made.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Wallace Estates Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Prime Property Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 143 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising 143 residential flats and 9 commercial units
- freeholder
Wallace Estates Limited holds the freehold title of the property
- agent
The RTM company appointed Prime Property Management Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal does not make an order for the appointment of a manager.
- s20c
The Tribunal does not make an order under section 20C of the Landlord
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.