Willow Grange, 1-78 Silas Court, Lockhart Road, Watford WD17 4BQ
CAM/26UK/LDC/2018/0018 · dispensation from consultation · Watford · decided 3 Jan 2019
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for replacing the three communal boilers, because the lack of heating and hot water was urgent and the leaseholders were not prejudiced; the reasonableness of the works and their cost remains open to challenge under section 27A.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 78 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Willow Grange, 1-78 Silas Court
- outcome
The Applicant is granted dispensation from the consultation requirements in respect of the replacement of the three communal boilers.
- s20
The Applicant is granted dispensation from the consultation requirements in respect of the replacement of the three communal boilers.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.