William Gaitskell House, 23 Paradise Street, London SE16 4QD
LON/00BE/LDC/2024/0676 · dispensation from consultation · Southwark · decided 20 Mar 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent completion of a new flat roof over Flat 6, though this does not decide whether the cost is payable or reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Hollybrook (Paradise Street) Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Warwick Estates Property Management Ltd |
| Building | A block, 9 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £11,304 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The application describes the Property as a block of nine residential flats.
- freeholder
Applicant: [name] (Paradise Street) Limited
- agent
Representative : Warwick Estates Property Management Ltd ([name] Ref: 30224)
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for dispensation
- total demanded
the cost of the works was £11,304
- s20
The Tribunal grants the application for dispensation (which it believes to be retrospective from the limited evidence before it)
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.