Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near OX28 6AF

Wickham House, 58 Market Square, Witney, Oxfordshire OX28 6AF

CAM/38UF/LDC/2023/0021 · dispensation from consultation · West Oxfordshire · decided 12 Jun 2023

The tribunal refused the landlord's application to dispense with the s.20 consultation requirements for urgent temporary roof repairs at Wickham House, so the charge for each leaseholder is capped at £250.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation refused
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companyWickham House Management Ltd.
Managing agentWarwick House Estates
BuildingA block, 7 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£2,880
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
subdivided and converted in the early 1980's, into 7No. self contained flats.
management company
Applicant : Wickham House Management Ltd.
agent
Warwick House Estates
outcome
The Tribunal does NOT grant dispensation from any of the requirements
total demanded
TOTAL COST INCLUDING VAT WAS £2880.00
s20
Application from dispensation of any of the statutory consultation process is refused.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.