Wickcliff Court, 27-29 Sackville Road, Bexhill on Sea, East Sussex, TN39 3DJ
CHI/21UG/LDC/2023/0096 · dispensation from consultation · Rother · decided 29 Sep 2023
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent upgrades to the fire detection system, on condition that the Triac Electrical quotation is provided to each leaseholder; the reasonableness of the cost was not decided.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Vitae Investments Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Oakfield P.M. Limited |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Vitae Investments Ltd
- agent
Representative : Oakfield P.M. Limited Managing Agents
- outcome
The Tribunal grants an order dispensing with the consultation requirements under S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal grants an order dispensing with the consultation requirements under S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the proposed upgrades to the fire detection system
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.