Wick Hall, Furze Hill, East Sussex BN1 1NH

CHI/00ML/LCP/2024/0003 · LCP · Brighton and Hove · decided 1 Apr 2025

figures not yet checked

After the right to manage claim failed, the tribunal decided the RTM company must pay the landlord's reasonable costs of £55,047.10 inclusive of VAT, including costs of the Upper Tribunal appeal.

Outcome	Other decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Not applied for
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Landlord or management company
Freeholder / landlord	not a company, or not stated
Management company	Baron Estate Management Limited
Managing agent	RTMF Services Limited
Building	A block, 168 flats
Service charge years in dispute	not stated
Items in dispute	not stated
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	£55,047.10
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	respondent to pay applicant landlord's costs of £55,047.10 inclusive of VAT

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n: the Property consists of 168 flats
outcome: we are satisfied that this is the amount which the Respondent should pay to the Applicant pursuant to the terms of the Act
total demanded: these amounts to £55,047.10 inclusive of VAT
total payable: this is the amount which the Respondent should pay to the Applicant pursuant to the terms of the Act
costs: these amounts to £55,047.10 inclusive of VAT

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.