Whitehouse Apartments, 9 Belvedere Road, London, SE1 8YP
LON/00BE/LDC/2023/0252 · dispensation from consultation · Lambeth · decided 26 Mar 2024
The tribunal granted dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for the urgent replacement of three communal boilers and a building management system at Whitehouse Apartments, because the existing boilers had failed and the heating supply was at risk.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Whitehouse Apartments Freehold Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 372 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
It now consists of 372 residential units and 4 commercial units.
- freeholder
Whitehouse Apartments Freehold Limited is the Landlord.
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation pursuant to s.20ZA in respect of the supply and installation of three new boilers with associated pipework
- s20
We grant dispensation pursuant to s.20ZA in respect of the supply and installation of three new boilers with associated pipework
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.